NOPLE believes that each of the following five projects offer a high
benefit to salmon with high certainty of success. Ranking five high-quality
projects that represent three types of salmon habitat
recovery methods (restoration, assessment, and acquisition) in four
distinct geographic areas (Deep Creek/Twin Rivers, Hoko
River, Strait
Nearshore, and Pysht River/Nearshore) was not an easy process. All of
these projects aim to recover priority
stocks in priority tiered watersheds. All of these projects enjoy strong
community
support.
All
of them should
be funded.
Project |
Priority Stocks |
Priority Processes and Limiting Factors |
Priority Actions and Areas |
Project Benefit and Certainty, TRG Ranking |
Community Support, LEG Ranking |
#1. Deep Creek Roads Decommissioning and Sediment Reduction
Project
See detailed explanations of project Fit to Strategy |
Fall Chum is listed as "depressed" in 2002 SaSI.
Olympic Peninsula coho, steelhead and SJF chum are identified
as priority WRIA 19 stock in the NOPLE Strategy.
Will prevent potentially catastrophic damage to three Tier 2
watersheds and will help protect spawning and rearing habitats
of multiple wild stocks.
No hatchery outplanting occurs in these watersheds which are managed
for wild fish production only. |
Restores natural processes, specifically, hydrology and sedimentation. Will
resolve a major limiting factor, excessive
sedimentation, at the watershed scale.
According to Deep-Twin Watershed
Analysis (USDA, 2002) and the NOPLE Strategy, excessive sedimentation
is a major limiting factor for these watersheds. Decommissioning
of 11 miles of road will return sediment processes to more natural
levels, and avoid repeat of the catastrophic landslides, debris
flows and severe
erosion that occurred in 80s and 90s.
|
Olympic National Forest has completed watershed
analyses (USDA 2002), an Access and Travel Management
plan (USDA 2003b), and an Environmental Assessment (USDA 2004)
that specifically identify this project as the priority action
and this road as the priority area.
Road decommissioning is the next priority action under NOPLE's
Priority Action and Areas Strategy, which is set forth in Section
F of the NOPLE Strategy.
The road to be decommissioned
crosses numerous 1st order tributaries and convergent headwalls
in three Tier 2 watersheds.
These three watersheds
also make up
one of
the watershed
clusters of the Intensely Monitored
Watersheds
(IMW) program.
|
The NOPLE TRG characterized this project as a particularly well-documented
and prioritized restoration action.
This project complements Lower Elwha Tribal restoration work
in Deep Creek and East Twin River, as well as the USFS
decommissioning of an additional 13.5 miles of
roads in these watersheds.
This project will protect substantial
SRFB restoration investments already made
downstream, i.e. IAC 00-1884, 02-1583, and 04-1546.
|
This project has strong support from the WRIA 19 citizen group
and the Lower Elwha Tribe.
Olympic National Forest currently has $260 K in match available
which will expire in 2006. It is unlikely
that the ONF will receive future funding for road
decommissioning. The availability of these funds (50% match of
total costs) represents an opportunity that must not be lost.
The TRG mean-score placed this project at rank #1. The WRIA 19
citizen group concurred with this ranking. The LEG maintained
this ranking.
|
#2. IMW Final Restoration Treatments
See detailed
explanations of project Fit to Strategy |
Fall Chum is listed as "depressed" in
2002 SaSI.
Olympic Peninsula coho, steelhead and SJF chum are identified
as priority WRIA 19 stock in the NOPLE Strategy.
No hatchery outplanting occurs in these watersheds which are managed
for wild fish production only.
IMW Project to answer important questions regarding
effects of watershed-scale restoration on entire stocks. |
Large woody debris serves a habitat
forming process, by increasing channel roughness, slowing water
velocities, building
channel
bed elevations,
trapping and sort spawning gravels, and forming scour pools.
Per Deep-Twin Watershed Analysis (USDA,
2002), as well as the NOPLE Strategy, lack of LWD in these watersheds
is a major limiting factor, resulting from previous land-use practices.
|
Tier 2 Watershed that is part of the IMW study.
This project will treat by helicopter the last remaining untreated
tributaries
and
mainstem
areas
(which were left untreated so far due to difficulty of access).
|
Will actually complete watershed-level restoration.
Important for IMW study. This project complements $2.3 million in restoration actions in
these watersheds to date.
This project complements ONF efforts at decommissioning roads
in these watersheds.
|
This project will
actually complete watershed-scale LWD restoration in Tier 2 watersheds
with very limited
residential development.
Employs tribal crew, which includes displaced fishermen and loggers.
Klallam people have strong historic ties to these watersheds.
The TRG mean-scores placed this project at rank #2. The WRIA 19
citizen group concurred with this ranking. The LEG maintained
this ranking. |
#3. Hoko River Habitat Restoration
See detailed
explanations of project Fit to Strategy |
Chinook is a priority stock in this area. Project
will recover segment of juvenile habitat for priority stock. Project
will also benefit coho, steelhead and cutthroat.
|
Road decommission, bridge removal, ELJs will restore sedimentation,
channel complexity, and LWD habitat forming process.
The premise behind the restoration design is to reestablish natural
riparian processes that have been interrupted by bank modifications
and constrictions.
The project addresses several identified limiting
factors on a sufficiently large scale. |
Action: Address priority limiting factors cited in LFA and Hoko
River Watershed Analysis.
Area: Tier 1 watershed. Over 2 miles of salmon habitat. Reach
has unique valley configuration, dynamic and productive floodplain
area, proximity to State land that will be conserved for high
habitat value.
|
High potential for restoration due to unique opportunities.
Complements completed and planned restoration by Makah and Elwha Tribes.
The applicant is proposing commonly used restoration measures
that are entirely feasible. DNR has demonstrated the ability to
perform this type of work, with Lower Elwha Tribe and Makah Tribe
contributing experience in the design, implementation and monitoring
phase.
|
Although tier 1 and high quality project, unique circumstances
of ranked 1 and 2 projects place this project at 3.
The TRG mean-scores placed this project at rank #3. The WRIA 19
citizen group concurred with this ranking. The LEG maintained this
ranking. |
#4. Nearshore Central Strait of Juan de Fuca: an ecosystem
assessment of salmonid use and priority restoration actions
See detailed
explanations of project Fit to Strategy |
Chinook, Chum, Bull Trout (federally ESA listed). Project will
answer questions about presence of nearshore lifestages of priority
stock along WRIA 18 and WRIA 19 nearshore.
|
According to Regional Nearshore and Marine Aspects of Salmon
Recovery in Puget Sound (Redman, et all, 2005), all 22 populations
of Chinook and all populations of Chum use the eastern Strait of
Juan de Fuca nearshore area. However, information on nearshore
usage of different habitat types is lacking. This assessment will
serve to define the where and when of chinook and chum use, which
is directly relevant to project development and sequencing in the
nearshore area.
|
Nearshore is Tier 1. The federal listing of critical habitat
boundary stops at the Elwha river mouth due to a lack of information
on fish use in nearshore areas west of the Elwha. The tech review
team conceded the importance to gain this use information and
may update the critical habitat boundary once such information
is available. This assessment will bridge the gap.
The NOPLE Nearshore Strategy indicates for the Central & Western
Straits that assessments to define habitat function are of equal
priority to protection and restoration actions (Table 3 of NOPLE
Nearshore Strategy)
|
This project is within critical listed habitat for federally
listed species. It is in Tier 1 and includes two Tier 1 watersheds
and a number of Tier 2 watersheds. It addresses a priority data
gap listed
in NOPLE nearshore strategy for WRIA 18 and 19. It addresses top
priority in Shared Strategy (Elwha Dungeness Region). This project
is key to prioritizing restoration and protection actions along
the Strait of Juan de Fuca nearshore.
|
Although tier 1 and high quality project, the TRG mean-score
placed this project at rank #4. The WRIA 19 citizen group concurred
with this ranking. The LEG maintained this ranking.
|
#5. Pysht Estuary Conservation Proposal
See detailed
explanations of project Fit to Strategy |
Project will protect estuary that includes priority
habitat of priority stock. Snorkel surveys have observed juvenile
Chinook, Coho and Chum, surf smelt and sand lance. |
Will preserve existing habitat and prevent
loss of estuarine habitat critical for food production, refuge,
juvenile rearing and smoltification, and migrating. Will protect
and ensure availability for future restoration measures critical
watershed processes in estuary. |
Nearshore is Tier 1. The Pysht watershed is Tier
2. Protection and restoration of Pysht estuary have been identified
as priority
actions
in the
NOPLE
Nearshore
Strategy.
The Puget Sound Salmon Recovery Plan (2005) and the Puget sound
Nearshore Project (2003) both prioritize protection of shoreline
and estuary habitats as highly significant actions for sustaining
salmonid recovery. |
Protecting and/or restoring estuarine
habitats on the Olympic Peninsula have been high priorities for
SRFB funding, including projects
at the Dungeness River and Jimmycomelately Creek. The Pysht Estuary
contains, by far, the largest concentration of estuarine habitats
in the
Strait
of Juan de Fuca between Dungeness Spit and Neah Bay. |
By allowing the landowner to retain certain uses
on portions of the 945 acres, this grand-scale project
is affordable while providing a very high level of protection to
the estuary and its associated nearshore habitats.
The TRG mean-scores placed this project at rank
#5. The WRIA 19 citizen group concurred with this ranking. The
LEG maintained this ranking. |